OPEN-VOCABULARY 3D SEGMENTATION

Hybrid Gaussians
for Robust Open-Vocabulary
3D Segmentation

with Multi-View Object Association
and Boundary Refinement

SEE IT IN 3D

4 scenes · 8 queries

Explore multi-view segmentation results. Each clip shows the original scene, the predicted object, and its depth.

Figurines · “Pikachu”Download clip
59.1%

LERF · average mIoU

96.1%

3D-OVS · average mIoU

ABSTRACT

More reliable objects.
More precise segmentation.

Open-vocabulary 3D segmentation aims to localize objects in 3D scenes from free-form text queries, providing a flexible interface for language-guided scene understanding. Recent progress in vision-language models and neural scene representations has advanced this area by lifting 2D cues into 3D and enriching NeRF- or 3DGS-based scene representations with semantic or identity information. However, robust object-level segmentation remains challenging in real image sequences, where incomplete or noisy 2D supervision can destabilize multi-view identity assignment, while full-scene semantic learning can weaken object-level discriminability.

To address these issues, we introduce Hybrid Gaussians, a unified 3D representation that jointly models object association and language-aligned semantics, along with a Multi-View Object Association mechanism that combines Observation Fusion and Semantic Contrastive Learning. We further introduce Boundary Reconstruction Optimization to explicitly improve contour quality by refining local boundary structure. Experiments on LERF and 3D-OVS demonstrate strong quantitative and qualitative performance. In particular, our method achieves 59.1% mIoU on LERF, yielding a 13.43% relative gain over the baseline. These results show that jointly optimizing object association and boundary-aware refinement substantially improves open-vocabulary 3D segmentation.

THE METHOD

A unified representation. Three complementary components.

Each Gaussian carries both an object identity and a learnable language-aligned semantic embedding, enabling object-conditioned rendering and learning.

Traditional Gaussian attributes compared with the hybrid identity and semantic representation, with examples of occlusion, motion blur, and intermittent visibility.
Hybrid Gaussians. Object identity and semantics share the same 3D primitives, supporting consistent segmentation under occlusion, motion blur, and incomplete observations.
Training pipeline linking input images and hybrid Gaussians to observation fusion, semantic contrastive learning, and boundary reconstruction optimization.
Training pipeline. Multi-view evidence stabilizes object association; object-specific semantic learning separates objects; boundary reconstruction refines local details.
01

Observation Fusion

Fuse object-mask support across views to update Gaussian identity assignments and build more reliable object support.

02

Semantic Contrastive Learning

Render object-conditioned semantic features and align them across views to improve language-level discrimination.

03

Boundary Reconstruction

Align image gradients near object contours to refine local structure and recover sharper segmentation boundaries.

EXPERIMENTS

Quantitative results

Open-vocabulary segmentation on LERF and 3D-OVS. All values are mIoU (%); higher is better. Results are reproduced from Table 1 of the paper.

LERF · fine-grained indoor scenes
MethodFigurinesTeatimeRamenKitchenAverage ↑
LERF38.645.028.237.937.4
LEGaussians40.860.346.039.446.6
G-Grouping28.846.831.111.629.6
3D-OVS44.856.128.739.342.2
OpenGaussian39.360.431.122.738.4
LangSplat44.765.151.244.551.4
Feature-3DGS58.840.543.7——
Seg-Splat49.863.554.440.752.1
COS3D60.065.135.942.150.8
Hybrid Gaussians Ours58.666.557.653.759.1
3D-OVS · language-driven scene segmentation
MethodBedBenchRoomSofaLawnAverage ↑
LERF73.553.246.627.073.754.8
ODISE52.624.152.548.339.843.5
OV-Seg79.888.971.466.181.277.5
LEGaussians52.861.351.842.059.653.5
G-Grouping64.595.696.491.397.089.0
3D-OVS89.589.392.874.088.286.8
LangSplat92.594.294.190.096.193.4
Feature-3DGS83.590.784.786.993.487.8
Laser91.488.392.886.088.289.3
SAGA97.495.496.893.596.696.0
Seg-Splat95.895.178.494.193.091.3
Hybrid Gaussians Ours96.494.998.094.596.896.1

Bold indicates the best score in each column. — indicates an unreported result. Methods with no reported scores for a dataset are omitted.

A CLOSER LOOK

Qualitative results

Multi-view segmentation comparisons on teatime, ramen, and waldo kitchen for LangSplat, Gaussian Grouping, OpenGaussian, Seg-Splat, and our method.
Qualitative comparison. Language queries select objects across views in the teatime, ramen, and waldo kitchen scenes. See the full-resolution figure for detailed comparisons.